Within the agreed scope, coordinated AI agents trace the clinical course, compare documentation, and identify potential care concerns and competing explanations. MFIG’s evidence matrix connects those concerns to supporting records, conflicting information, evidence gaps, and unanswered questions—organizing findings for clinical review.
How MFIG works
MFIG starts with the review scope that fits your question: Focused Review investigates one clinical issue for individuals; Comprehensive Clinical Review examines the agreed record set for potential clinical issues across the care provided, including concerns you may not know to ask about. Further investigation and independent expertise follow as the evidence and engagement warrant.
Within the agreed review scope, coordinated multi-agent AI-assisted analysis organizes a structured clinical evidence matrix linking concerns to supporting and conflicting records, missing evidence, and unresolved questions. Qualified registered nurses review findings against source records, providing a clinical foundation for counsel's assessment of potential case viability. Counsel determines legal merits; independently engaged specialists provide their own professional opinions.
- Start with a clear assessment.Choose investigation of one clinical issue or broader review across the agreed records to identify potential concerns and evidence gaps.
- Investigate what remains uncertain.Further clinical review tests concerns and alternative explanations within the agreed scope.
- Bring in independent expertise.Physician opinions, declarations, and testimony are arranged when needed and quoted separately.
An appropriately qualified registered nurse examines relevant records and findings, checks significant concerns against the documentation, and evaluates their significance in the clinical context of the care provided. The nurse considers alternative explanations and explains what the evidence supports. The depth of RN investigation follows the agreed service scope.
When further development is included in the engagement, MFIG identifies evidence needed to answer unresolved questions, explains where records may be obtained, and helps prepare appropriate questions for treating providers. New information is assessed against earlier findings, remaining gaps, and competing explanations.
When physician expertise is warranted, MFIG prepares a focused packet connecting clinical concerns to relevant records, supporting and conflicting evidence, and specific questions. A specialty-matched physician independently evaluates the evidence and determines which conclusions, if any, support a professional opinion.
Each stage follows the evidence and the agreed scope. View services and pricing or explore a fictional review sample.